_覓 | 覦覈襦 | 豕蠏手 | 殊螳 | 譯殊碁 |
FrontPage › 蟲譟磯逢
|
|
lavaan package tutorial 磯狩 覲瑚碓. lavaan "latent variable analysis( 覲 覿)" 曙. 覲, 蟯豸 覲襦覿 豢伎 豢 螳 覲襯 襷. 蟲譟 覦 覲れ る 蠍襯 谿瑚.
[edit]
1 螻狩 蟲譟 覦 #http://www.ktcloudware.com/seminar/down/06.pdf
[edit]
2 語 覿(cfa, confirmatory factor analysis) #HolzingerSwineford1939 一危磯 , 一危一 る 蠍襯 谿瑚覃 .
library("lavaan") data(HolzingerSwineford1939) str(HolzingerSwineford1939) > library("lavaan") > data(HolzingerSwineford1939) > str(HolzingerSwineford1939) 'data.frame': 301 obs. of 15 variables: $ id : int 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 ... $ sex : int 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 ... $ ageyr : int 13 13 13 13 12 14 12 12 13 12 ... $ agemo : int 1 7 1 2 2 1 1 2 0 5 ... $ school: Factor w/ 2 levels "Grant-White",..: 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ... $ grade : int 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 ... $ x1 : num 3.33 5.33 4.5 5.33 4.83 ... $ x2 : num 7.75 5.25 5.25 7.75 4.75 5 6 6.25 5.75 5.25 ... $ x3 : num 0.375 2.125 1.875 3 0.875 ... $ x4 : num 2.33 1.67 1 2.67 2.67 ... $ x5 : num 5.75 3 1.75 4.5 4 3 6 4.25 5.75 5 ... $ x6 : num 1.286 1.286 0.429 2.429 2.571 ... $ x7 : num 3.39 3.78 3.26 3 3.7 ... $ x8 : num 5.75 6.25 3.9 5.3 6.3 6.65 6.2 5.15 4.65 4.55 ... $ x9 : num 6.36 7.92 4.42 4.86 5.92 ... > model <- " visual =~ x1 + x2 + x3 textual =~ x4 + x5 + x6 speed =~ x7 + x8 + x9 " fit <- cfa(model, data = HolzingerSwineford1939) summary(fit, fit.measures = TRUE) > summary(fit, fit.measures = TRUE) lavaan (0.5-15) converged normally after 35 iterations Number of observations 301 Estimator ML Minimum Function Test Statistic 85.306 Degrees of freedom 24 P-value (Chi-square) 0.000 Model test baseline model: Minimum Function Test Statistic 918.852 Degrees of freedom 36 P-value 0.000 User model versus baseline model: Comparative Fit Index (CFI) 0.931 Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) 0.896 Loglikelihood and Information Criteria: Loglikelihood user model (H0) -3737.745 Loglikelihood unrestricted model (H1) -3695.092 Number of free parameters 21 Akaike (AIC) 7517.490 Bayesian (BIC) 7595.339 Sample-size adjusted Bayesian (BIC) 7528.739 Root Mean Square Error of Approximation: RMSEA 0.092 90 Percent Confidence Interval 0.071 0.114 P-value RMSEA <= 0.05 0.001 Standardized Root Mean Square Residual: SRMR 0.065 Parameter estimates: Information Expected Standard Errors Standard Estimate Std.err Z-value P(>|z|) Latent variables: visual =~ x1 1.000 x2 0.554 0.100 5.554 0.000 x3 0.729 0.109 6.685 0.000 textual =~ x4 1.000 x5 1.113 0.065 17.014 0.000 x6 0.926 0.055 16.703 0.000 speed =~ x7 1.000 x8 1.180 0.165 7.152 0.000 x9 1.082 0.151 7.155 0.000 Covariances: visual ~~ textual 0.408 0.074 5.552 0.000 speed 0.262 0.056 4.660 0.000 textual ~~ speed 0.173 0.049 3.518 0.000 Variances: x1 0.549 0.114 x2 1.134 0.102 x3 0.844 0.091 x4 0.371 0.048 x5 0.446 0.058 x6 0.356 0.043 x7 0.799 0.081 x8 0.488 0.074 x9 0.566 0.071 visual 0.809 0.145 textual 0.979 0.112 speed 0.384 0.086 > library(semPlot) semPaths(fit, what="std", edge.label.cex = 0.6, sizeMan=5, sizeLat=5, curve=0.4 ) 螳 朱, 伎 手 .
library(qgraph) qgraph.lavaan(fit, layout="tree", titles=F, vsize.man=5, vsize.lat=5, filetype="", include=4, curve=-0.4, edge.label.cex=0.6) [edit]
3 蟲譟磯逢(SEM, structural equation modeling) #library("lavaan") data(PoliticalDemocracy) model <- " # measurement model ind60 =~ x1 + x2 + x3 dem60 =~ y1 + y2 + y3 + y4 dem65 =~ y5 + y6 + y7 + y8 # regressions dem60 ~ ind60 dem65 ~ ind60 + dem60 # residual correlations y1 ~~ y5 y2 ~~ y4 + y6 y3 ~~ y7 y4 ~~ y8 y6 ~~ y8 " fit <- sem(model, data = PoliticalDemocracy) summary(fit, standardized = TRUE) > summary(fit, standardized = TRUE) lavaan (0.5-15) converged normally after 68 iterations Number of observations 75 Estimator ML Minimum Function Test Statistic 38.125 Degrees of freedom 35 P-value (Chi-square) 0.329 Parameter estimates: Information Expected Standard Errors Standard Estimate Std.err Z-value P(>|z|) Std.lv Std.all Latent variables: ind60 =~ x1 1.000 0.670 0.920 x2 2.180 0.139 15.742 0.000 1.460 0.973 x3 1.819 0.152 11.967 0.000 1.218 0.872 dem60 =~ y1 1.000 2.223 0.850 y2 1.257 0.182 6.889 0.000 2.794 0.717 y3 1.058 0.151 6.987 0.000 2.351 0.722 y4 1.265 0.145 8.722 0.000 2.812 0.846 dem65 =~ y5 1.000 2.103 0.808 y6 1.186 0.169 7.024 0.000 2.493 0.746 y7 1.280 0.160 8.002 0.000 2.691 0.824 y8 1.266 0.158 8.007 0.000 2.662 0.828 Regressions: dem60 ~ ind60 1.483 0.399 3.715 0.000 0.447 0.447 dem65 ~ ind60 0.572 0.221 2.586 0.010 0.182 0.182 dem60 0.837 0.098 8.514 0.000 0.885 0.885 Covariances: y1 ~~ y5 0.624 0.358 1.741 0.082 0.624 0.296 y2 ~~ y4 1.313 0.702 1.871 0.061 1.313 0.273 y6 2.153 0.734 2.934 0.003 2.153 0.356 y3 ~~ y7 0.795 0.608 1.308 0.191 0.795 0.191 y4 ~~ y8 0.348 0.442 0.787 0.431 0.348 0.109 y6 ~~ y8 1.356 0.568 2.386 0.017 1.356 0.338 Variances: x1 0.082 0.019 0.082 0.154 x2 0.120 0.070 0.120 0.053 x3 0.467 0.090 0.467 0.239 y1 1.891 0.444 1.891 0.277 y2 7.373 1.374 7.373 0.486 y3 5.067 0.952 5.067 0.478 y4 3.148 0.739 3.148 0.285 y5 2.351 0.480 2.351 0.347 y6 4.954 0.914 4.954 0.443 y7 3.431 0.713 3.431 0.322 y8 3.254 0.695 3.254 0.315 ind60 0.448 0.087 1.000 1.000 dem60 3.956 0.921 0.800 0.800 dem65 0.172 0.215 0.039 0.039 > library(semPlot) semPaths(fit, what="std", edge.label.cex = 0.6, sizeMan=5, sizeLat=5, curve=0.4, edge.color="black" ) [edit]
4.1 intercept #model <- " # three-factor model visual =~ x1 + x2 + x3 textual =~ x4 + x5 + x6 speed =~ x7 + x8 + x9 # intercepts x1 ~ 1 x2 ~ 1 x3 ~ 1 x4 ~ 1 x5 ~ 1 x6 ~ 1 x7 ~ 1 x8 ~ 1 x9 ~ 1 " fit <- cfa(model, data = HolzingerSwineford1939, meanstructure=T) summary(fit, fit.measures = TRUE) library(semPlot) semPaths(fit, what="std", edge.label.cex = 0.6, sizeMan=5, sizeLat=5, curve=0.4, edge.color="black" ) [edit]
4.2 group #model <- " # three-factor model visual =~ x1 + x2 + x3 textual =~ x4 + x5 + x6 speed =~ x7 + x8 + x9 " fit <- cfa(model, data = HolzingerSwineford1939, group="school") summary(fit, fit.measures = TRUE) [edit]
4.3 starting value #model <- " # three-factor model visual =~ x1 + 0.5*x2 + c(0.6, 0.8)*x3 textual =~ x4 + start(c(1.2, 0.6))*x5 + a*x6 speed =~ x7 + x8 + x9 " fit <- cfa(model, data = HolzingerSwineford1939, group="school") summary(fit, fit.measures = TRUE)starting value螳 0.5*x2螳 襦 譯殊 讌 . c(0.6, 0.8) 螳 覯″磯 group覲襦 starting value襯 磯 譴 . [edit]
4.4 fitting function #HS.model <- ' visual =~ x1 + x2 + x3 textual =~ x4 + x5 + x6 speed =~ x7 + x8 + x9 ' fit <- cfa(HS.model, data = HolzingerSwineford1939, group = "school", group.equal = c("loadings")) summary(fit)group.equal loadings れ螻 螳 蟆れ .
But what if you want to constrain a whole group of parameters (say all factor loadings and intercepts) across groups, except for one or two parameters that need to stay free in all groups. For this scenario, you can use the argument group.partial, containing the names of those parameters that need to remain free. For example:
fit <- cfa(HS.model, data = HolzingerSwineford1939, group = "school", group.equal = c("loadings", "intercepts"), group.partial = c("visual=~x2", "x7~1")) [edit]
4.5 invariance #library(semTools) measurementInvariance(HS.model, data = HolzingerSwineford1939, group = "school") [edit]
5 1 #谿瑚: http://r-project.kr/content/r%EB%A1%9C-%ED%95%98%EB%8A%94-%EA%B5%AC%EC%A1%B0%EB%B0%A9%EC%A0%95%EC%8B%9D-lavaan2amos 覓語襯 覲願 .
library(lavaan) > str(ch9.ex1) 'data.frame': 8 obs. of 5 variables: $ attitude: int 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 $ loyalty : int 2 3 3 4 4 5 4 5 $ price : int 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 $ quality : int 2 3 2 3 3 4 3 5 $ design : int 2 3 4 2 5 3 2 4 > ch9.ex1 attitude loyalty price quality design 1 2 2 4 2 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 4 4 4 4 3 3 2 5 4 4 2 3 5 6 4 5 2 4 3 7 4 4 1 3 2 8 5 5 1 5 4 > path.model <- " + #regressions + attitude ~ price + quality + design + loyalty ~ attitude + + #residual covariances + price ~~ quality + price ~~ design + quality ~~ design + " > path.example <- lavaan(path.model, data=ch9.ex1, auto.var=T, auto.fix.first=T, fixed.x=F) > summary(path.example) lavaan (0.5-15) converged normally after 43 iterations Number of observations 8 Estimator ML Minimum Function Test Statistic 1.718 Degrees of freedom 3 P-value (Chi-square) 0.633 Parameter estimates: Information Expected Standard Errors Standard Estimate Std.err Z-value P(>|z|) Regressions: attitude ~ price -0.382 0.133 -2.869 0.004 quality 0.459 0.159 2.883 0.004 design 0.063 0.109 0.579 0.562 loyalty ~ attitude 1.064 0.135 7.906 0.000 Covariances: price ~~ quality -0.688 0.440 -1.563 0.118 design -0.313 0.431 -0.725 0.468 quality ~~ design 0.234 0.355 0.660 0.509 Variances: attitude 0.097 0.048 loyalty 0.106 0.053 price 1.250 0.625 quality 0.859 0.430 design 1.109 0.555 > summary(path.example, fit.measures=T) lavaan (0.5-15) converged normally after 43 iterations Number of observations 8 Estimator ML Minimum Function Test Statistic 1.718 Degrees of freedom 3 P-value (Chi-square) 0.633 Model test baseline model: Minimum Function Test Statistic 40.609 Degrees of freedom 10 P-value 0.000 User model versus baseline model: Comparative Fit Index (CFI) 1.000 Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) 1.140 Loglikelihood and Information Criteria: Loglikelihood user model (H0) -36.520 Loglikelihood unrestricted model (H1) -35.662 Number of free parameters 12 Akaike (AIC) 97.041 Bayesian (BIC) 97.994 Sample-size adjusted Bayesian (BIC) 62.535 Root Mean Square Error of Approximation: RMSEA 0.000 90 Percent Confidence Interval 0.000 0.481 P-value RMSEA <= 0.05 0.641 Standardized Root Mean Square Residual: SRMR 0.021 Parameter estimates: Information Expected Standard Errors Standard Estimate Std.err Z-value P(>|z|) Regressions: attitude ~ price -0.382 0.133 -2.869 0.004 quality 0.459 0.159 2.883 0.004 design 0.063 0.109 0.579 0.562 loyalty ~ attitude 1.064 0.135 7.906 0.000 Covariances: price ~~ quality -0.688 0.440 -1.563 0.118 design -0.313 0.431 -0.725 0.468 quality ~~ design 0.234 0.355 0.660 0.509 Variances: attitude 0.097 0.048 loyalty 0.106 0.053 price 1.250 0.625 quality 0.859 0.430 design 1.109 0.555 > summary(path.example, standardized=T) lavaan (0.5-15) converged normally after 43 iterations Number of observations 8 Estimator ML Minimum Function Test Statistic 1.718 Degrees of freedom 3 P-value (Chi-square) 0.633 Parameter estimates: Information Expected Standard Errors Standard Estimate Std.err Z-value P(>|z|) Std.lv Std.all Regressions: attitude ~ price -0.382 0.133 -2.869 0.004 -0.382 -0.498 quality 0.459 0.159 2.883 0.004 0.459 0.497 design 0.063 0.109 0.579 0.562 0.063 0.078 loyalty ~ attitude 1.064 0.135 7.906 0.000 1.064 0.942 Covariances: price ~~ quality -0.688 0.440 -1.563 0.118 -0.688 -0.663 design -0.313 0.431 -0.725 0.468 -0.313 -0.265 quality ~~ design 0.234 0.355 0.660 0.509 0.234 0.240 Variances: attitude 0.097 0.048 0.097 0.132 loyalty 0.106 0.053 0.106 0.113 price 1.250 0.625 1.250 1.000 quality 0.859 0.430 0.859 1.000 design 1.109 0.555 1.109 1.000 > library(qgraph) Warning message: れ qgraph R 覯 3.0.3 焔給 > qgraph.lavaan(path.example, layout="spring", + vsize.man=8, + vsize.lat=8, + filetype="", + include=4, + curve=-0.4, + edge.label.cex=0.6)
[edit]
6 2 #http://www.inside-r.org/packages/cran/qgraph/docs/qgraph.lavaan
## Not run: ## The industrialization and Political Democracy Example # Example from lavaan::sem help file: require("lavaan") ## Bollen (1989), page 332 model <- ' # latent variable definitions ind60 =~ x1 + x2 + x3 dem60 =~ y1 + y2 + y3 + y4 dem65 =~ y5 + equal("dem60=~y2")*y6 + equal("dem60=~y3")*y7 + equal("dem60=~y4")*y8 # regressions dem60 ~ ind60 dem65 ~ ind60 + dem60 # residual correlations y1 ~~ y5 y2 ~~ y4 + y6 y3 ~~ y7 y4 ~~ y8 y6 ~~ y8 ' fit <- sem(model, data=PoliticalDemocracy) # Plot standardized model (numerical): qgraph.lavaan(fit,layout="tree",vsize.man=5,vsize.lat=10, filetype="",include=4,curve=-0.4,edge.label.cex=0.6) # Plot standardized model (graphical): qgraph.lavaan(fit,layout="tree",vsize.man=5,vsize.lat=10, filetype="",include=8,curve=-0.4,edge.label.cex=0.6) # Create output document: qgraph.lavaan(fit,layout="spring",vsize.man=5,vsize.lat=10, filename="lavaan") ## End(Not run) [edit]
7 谿瑚襭 #
鏤
|
襷 轟 覦磯ゼ 襷り 矩る れ 覿覈 覈襯 螳語り 螻 殊 讌螻 手 譯朱 煙 殊 讌 襷. 蠏碁れ蟆 螻 覦れ 蟆曙 れ 譴. (譽襴) |